Newsroom University of Manchester

Expert unlocks truth of Stanford Prison Experiment in new TV show

Thu, 15 May 2025 12:00:00 +0100

National Geographic is set to premiere ‘The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unlocking the Truth’ in the UK this month, which features expert commentary from The University of Manchester’s .

The gripping new docuseries revisits the infamous , but with a twist. Through accounts from the original prisoners and guards, many of whom are speaking on camera for the very first time, the docuseries shares a groundbreaking look at one of history’s most notorious psychological studies.

The study, controversial yet influential, has shaped popular understanding of human behaviour for over half a century. Re-examining the experiment from a different perspective, the docuseries set out to challenge long-held beliefs around Philip Zimbardo’s ‘guards vs prisoners’ study.

Surviving participants confront the emotional weight they have carried for decades, alongside newly uncovered archive footage, dramatisation and contributions from leading scholars.

Professor Scott-Bottoms expresses the fine line between theatrical roleplay and real psychological trauma. Bringing a unique interdisciplinary perspective to the psychological, cultural, and theatrical dimensions of the original Stanford Prison Experiment, he noted:

Building upon his 2024 book, , the unsettling history of role-playing in ‘constructed situations’ is explored through his commentary on the performative dynamic of the experiment and its wider societal implications. Students from the School of the Arts, Languages & Cultures also feature in the reenactments shown in the series.

To mark the UK premiere, the , in partnership with , will be hosting an in-conversation event on Wednesday 4 June titled ‘’.&�Բ��;

Professor Stephen Scott-Bottoms will be joined by from the , who is also among the expert commentators featured in the series, alongside , Director of the docuseries. An internationally recognised expert on social identity, collective behaviour, intergroup conflict, and leadership influence, Professor Stephen Reicher co-led the BBC’s partial reconstruction of the Stanford Prison study,

The event will feature behind-the-scenes insights into the making of the series, a discussion on the enduring relevance of the Stanford study and a live audience Q&A. It is open to the public and promises a compelling dialogue on truth, myth, and morality in psychological research.

Lemn Sissay OBE to judge University's 2025 Micropoetry Competition

Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:51:05 +0000

Esteemed poet and former Chancellor of The University of Manchester, Lemn Sissay OBE, has been unveiled as a returning judge for the 2025 edition of the annual Micropoetry competition.

As the honorary chair of creative writing, Lemn will joined by fellow judges John McAuliffe, Professor of Poetry at The University of Manchester and 91ֱ��-based poet and critic, Maryam Hessavi.

The theme for 2025 is ‘Connections’ and the challenge is simple - write a ‘micro poem’ of no more than 280 characters, and submit using the official competition entry form.

Lemn said: “The Micropoetry Competition sets a wonderful yet challenging task of translating a theme into a short work of art. It’s a craft to tell a story in such a manner and I’m looking forward to reading the 2025 entries, centred around the chosen theme. As someone who published a book of tweets in the form of quatrains, I urge you to pen your poem and enter the competition.”

Entries must be submitted by 23:59 on Saturday 21 June 2025, with winners to be announced by Friday 25 July 2025.

Prizes will be awarded for first place (£500) and the two runners-up (£250), with a £25 book token for winner of the under-18s category.

Professor of Poetry at The University of Manchester, John McAuliffe, said: "World Poetry Day celebrates all that is fascinating about poetry and its manifold forms. Our Micropoetry Competition explores the art of translating a set theme into a condensed poem that captures attention and shares a story.”

For the full entry details as well as the terms and conditions,

91ֱ�� academic condemns Trump’s attacks on diversity initiatives

Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:57:58 +0000

An expert from The University of Manchester has strongly criticised US President Donald Trump’s recent remarks blaming a tragic aviation accident on diversity initiatives. Lecturer in Creative and Cultural Industries Dr Roaa Ali argues that these claims are not just factually baseless – they also serve to reinforce systemic racism under the guise of ‘neoliberal meritocracy’.

Following the mid-air collision between a passenger jet and a helicopter in Washington DC in January, Trump suggested that diversity programmes contributed to the crash. His remarks, which have been widely contested and refuted, reflect a broader pattern of right-wing rhetoric that Dr Ali says disguises racism as a defence of economic and social stability.

She warns that his comments are emblematic of a growing trend in which diversity is scapegoated for economic and institutional failures.

“Trump’s rhetoric is not just problematic - it is overtly racist,” she states. “His claims perpetuate the myth that racialised individuals are inherently unqualified and that diversity efforts undermine meritocracy - when, in fact, meritocracy itself is a neoliberal myth.”

She highlights that systemic barriers - not individual incompetence - shape access to education, employment and economic opportunities. “Capitalism has always been racial,” she explains, referencing Cedric Robinson’s analysis of racial capitalism. “The idea that economic decline is linked to racial equality is a dangerous falsehood that has been used time and again to justify discrimination.”

Dr Ali’s research challenges the assumption that diversity hires lack merit. In her interviews with ethnically diverse job entrants and organisations overseeing diversity initiatives in the UK, she found that these individuals are often overqualified. “They go through multiple rounds of stringent recruitment processes,” she notes, “yet their presence is still framed as a threat rather than a step towards equity.”

She further criticises the misconception that diversity schemes provide an undue advantage. “These schemes exist to address structural racism, but they do not go far enough in creating lasting change,” she says. “Instead of meaningful intervention, they serve as temporary solutions that do not dismantle the barriers faced by racialised communities.”

Dr Ali calls on policymakers, cultural institutions and the public to actively resist these harmful narratives and support genuine structural change.